Your RTO rights depend on which state you're in你的 RTO 权益取决于你在哪个州

In most US states employment is at-will, so an employer may require in-office work as a condition of the job — but California, New York and Washington impose stronger protections, and remote work may be mandatory as a disability accommodation under the ADA. Check your state guide below.美国多数州为 at-will 雇佣，雇主要求坐班作为工作条件原则上可行——但加州、纽约州与华盛顿州保护更强，且依 ADA 远程工作可能是必须提供的医疗便利。请查看你所在州的指南。

States following the convenience rule — notably New York — may tax remote employees whose employer is based there even when the employee lives elsewhere. Other states tax only where you live or physically work. See the convenience-rule states guide.遵循便利原则的州——尤其是纽约州——可能对雇主总部在该州、本人在外州远程工作的员工征税。其他州通常只按居住地或实际工作地征税。详见便利原则州指南。

The convenience rule allows a state to tax your income if you work remotely only for your own convenience, not for employer necessity. New York is the best-known example; several other states assert similar rules.便利原则指：若你远程工作仅出于个人便利、而非雇主要求，该州仍可对你的收入征税。最著名的例子是纽约州，其他若干州也有类似规则。

No single federal RTO law exists. Federal laws like the ADA and FMLA set minimum floors; state laws can add stronger protections. The more protective rule generally applies.目前没有联邦层面的 RTO 专门法律。ADA、FMLA 等联邦法设定底线，州法可以加强保护。两者冲突时通常以保护更强者为准。

California, Washington, Illinois and Colorado stand out for paid-leave protections and telework transparency rules, while Texas and Florida offer no state income tax but weaker employment protections. Compare states with the 50-state matrix tool.加州、华盛顿州、伊利诺伊州与科罗拉多州在带薪休假与远程透明规则上突出；德州与佛州无州所得税，但雇佣保护较弱。用 50 州矩阵工具对比各州。